Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: separate tablespaces for tables and indexes

Re: separate tablespaces for tables and indexes

From: Jared Still <jkstill_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 11:30:18 -0800
Message-ID: <bf46380412131130692e2eb4@mail.gmail.com>


On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 14:15:06 -0500, Mercadante, Thomas F <thomas.mercadante_at_labor.state.ny.us> wrote:
> Jeff,
>
> In my view, separating indexes and tables was never about tablespace
> contention. It was always about moving the index and table files onto
> separate disk drives to avoid disk contention.
>

Hi Tom,

Separating Tables from Indexes is good for managing different types of objects.

How would separating them enhance performance?

In a multi-user system with several sessions selecting, inserting, deleting and modifying data, separating the indexes from the tables would not seem to have any performance benefit.

Even if there is only one user on the system, indexes must be read before the table is read ( if the table is read at all). They aren't actually in contention.

-- 
Jared Still
Certifiable Oracle DBA and Part Time Perl Evangelist
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Mon Dec 13 2004 - 13:29:37 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US