From oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org Fri Dec 3 05:47:56 2004 Return-Path: Received: from air189.startdedicated.com (root@localhost) by orafaq.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id iB3Blu815082 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2004 05:47:56 -0600 X-ClientAddr: 206.53.239.180 Received: from turing.freelists.org (freelists-180.iquest.net [206.53.239.180]) by air189.startdedicated.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id iB3Blu015077 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2004 05:47:56 -0600 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 9605F72C53D; Fri, 3 Dec 2004 06:54:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (turing [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 26570-01; Fri, 3 Dec 2004 06:54:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id AB92572CAB9; Fri, 3 Dec 2004 06:53:20 -0500 (EST) Content-return: allowed Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2004 07:49:45 -0400 From: "Boivin, Patrice J" Subject: RE: 10g release 2 To: oracle-l@freelists.org Message-id: <1A4AC4BAB9C50A42854582B69B08C0340624C25D@MSGMARBIO05> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-archive-position: 13060 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org Errors-To: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org X-original-sender: BoivinP@mar.dfo-mpo.gc.ca Precedence: normal Reply-To: BoivinP@mar.dfo-mpo.gc.ca X-list: oracle-l X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at freelists.org The reason I ask about the final release is that we only install final releases... Life is complicated enough as it is. : ) Pat. -----Original Message----- From: Mladen Gogala [mailto:gogala@sbcglobal.net] Sent: December 3, 2004 1:00 AM To: BoivinP@mar.dfo-mpo.gc.ca Cc: oracle-l@freelists.org Subject: Re: 10g release 2 On 12/02/2004 02:11:29 PM, Boivin, Patrice J wrote: > Does anyone know if 10g Release 2 will be the final release for 10g? Pull yourself together! I don't know anybody who has 10g in production and you are talking about the "final release"? > > Will 10g Rel 2 be announced for mid 2005? I believe that the way they started, they'll soon switch to stardates when announcing new releases. May be extending life of releases and fixing them a bit wouldn't be such a bad idea? Or, alternatively, they may start talking in years A.L. (= After Longhorn). That will provide the element of randomness that time tables so desperately need. -- Mladen Gogala Oracle DBA -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l