Frank,
IMHO it is a bad idea to try, in whichever way, to improve on the way SYS
objects work. If Oracle cannot properly take care of its own data, then the
situation is hopeless. I would rather say that the thing to check is the
deepreason behind those calls.
- SELECT SYSDATE FROM DUAL : is it useful? Why not use SYSDATE directly in
the INSERT or UPDATE statements? Is the time component of the date really
useful in your application? Otherwise I guess that the initialisation
sectiąon of a package, assuming of course that sessions don't stay connected
overnight, could do.
- Sequences. You know how it works. Oracle updates the next value by
'increment' into seq$, and loads 'increment' values up to this 'next value'
on disk in a cache. Once all values in cache have been used, it does it
again. Increase the CACHE value of the sequences you use most.
- Recursive dictionary queries are run because the information isn't found
in the library cache. Either you have an enormous number of views, each user
having his/her own set, in which case it would be wise to see how they are
defined (do they use pseudo columns like USER or functions such as
sys_context(), allowing a same view to return different dat to different
users). Or your library cache is definitely too tiny (V$LIBRARYCACHE ?) and
the solution is probably to increase the size of your shared_pool.
Regards,
Stephane Faroult
RoughSea Ltd
http://www.roughsea.com
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 09:12 , Frank B Hansen <frank4oraclel_at_yahoo.dk> sent:
Hi List
I do have a performance problem... The following stats are summed up over 10
days.
#Parse = #Executions !! (not good)
SQL text Execs Rows proc Parse calls % impact
---------------------------------------- -------- --------- -----------
Query 1 854391 854391 854391 12.14
Query 2 1303493 1303491 1303493 18.52
Query 3 3926789 3926775 3926789 55.79
Query 1: SELECT SYSDATE FROM DUAL
Query 2: update seq$ set increment$=:2,minvalue=:...
Query 3: select text from view$ where rowid=:1
Any suggestions how to get the number of parses down ? Can objects owned by
SYS be pinned or is that the wrong idea ?
Thanks, Frank
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l[1]
Received on Thu Dec 02 2004 - 02:32:55 CST