Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Limitations of MSSQL Server Vs. Oracle OR simply otherwise limitations in general - OT

RE: Limitations of MSSQL Server Vs. Oracle OR simply otherwise limitations in general - OT

From: Goulet, Dick <DGoulet_at_vicr.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 11:10:55 -0500
Message-ID: <4001DEAF7DF9BD498B58B45051FBEA6501DFA434@25exch1.vicorpower.vicr.com>


Ian,

        Correction, it's not "nearly impossible", it IS impossible.=20

Dick Goulet
Senior Oracle DBA
Oracle Certified 8i DBA
-----Original Message-----
From: MacGregor, Ian A. [mailto:ian_at_slac.stanford.edu]=20 Sent: Sunday, November 28, 2004 10:32 AM To: gogala_at_sbcglobal.net; BoivinP_at_mar.dfo-mpo.gc.ca Cc: chupit_at_gmail.com; vivek_sharma_at_infosys.com; ORACLE-L Subject: RE: Limitations of MSSQL Server Vs. Oracle OR simply otherwise limitations in general - OT

Microsoft has begun to remove support for other databases other than SQL =3D
Server from some of its products such as Project Central. This is one =3D
way of worming their way into shops. Identity management is another = =3D
example. Once this is established, the data needs to be shared with =3D other databases. This is easier if the other databases are also SQL =3D SERVER. Unless one works in a Windows-free environment, it is nearly impossible =3D
to prevent the introduction of SQL Server. =3D20

Ian MacGregor
Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
ian_at_slac.stanford.edu

-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org =3D
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Mladen Gogala Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 4:30 AM To: BoivinP_at_mar.dfo-mpo.gc.ca
Cc: 'chupit_at_gmail.com'; vivek_sharma_at_infosys.com; ORACLE-L Subject: Re: Limitations of MSSQL Server Vs. Oracle OR simply otherwise =3D
limitations in general - OT

There was an article discussed recently on comp.databases.oracle.server which can be used for a decent management presentation, for the PHB and =3D
=3D3D20
friends.
The article in question is full of gross factual inaccuracies, the most =3D
=3D3D20
flagrant being the statement on page 12 that PCTINCREASE cannot be defined for rollback segments, so rollback segments cannot grow. The =3D =3D3D20
fact that despite not knowing a squat about oracle, the authors =3D3D20 concluded that oracle looks much better then SQL server only shows how bad SQL server really is. I made some comments on =3D3D20 comp.databases.oracle.server, Howard Rogers vivisected the article in = =3D
=3D3D20
detail and the general conclusion is that the article is bad, but SQL = =3D
=3D3D20
server is worse. I cannot fathom why do people expect the company that has created such a peace of s....oftware as Windows to create a good database software?
After the usual dose of rant about MicroS*t, the article is well =3D3D20 written and makes oracle look much better then MS-SQL Server. It = =3D3D20
actually reveals the ugly truth: Oracle and SQL Server do not play in = =3D
=3D3D20
the same league. You cannot compare little league teams to the Yanks =3D =3D3D20
(if someone mentions things like the curse and some garments from NE, = =3D
=3D3D20
I'll get seriously angry).

On 11/24/2004 07:04:50 AM, Boivin, Patrice J wrote:
> One thing comes to mind... SQL Server 2005 is not out yet, it's still
> in
> Developer Preview isn't it?

>=3D3D20

> Maybe they could compare it with 10g Release 2 or perhaps Oracle 11?
> Maybe
> that will be out at the same time as SQL Server 2005.
>=3D3D20

> Patrice.
>=3D3D20
>=3D3D20
>=3D3D20

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Edgar Chupit [mailto:chupit_at_gmail.com]
> Sent: November 23, 2004 2:00 PM
> To: vivek_sharma_at_infosys.com
> Cc: ORACLE-L
> Subject: Re: Limitations of MSSQL Server Vs. Oracle OR simply
> otherwise
> limitations in general - OT
>=3D3D20
>=3D3D20

> Recently I've come across this link that could be an interesting
> comparison and couldn't resist from posting it to the list (although =
=3D
=3D3D20
> I
> must admit that I'm not fully agree with author):
>=3D3D20
> =3D

http://www.wisdomforce.com/dweb/resources/docs/MSSQL2005_ORACLE10g_compa r=3D
=3D3D
e.p
> df
>=3D3D20

> Hope this will help.
>=3D3D20

> On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 16:36:17 +0530, VIVEK_SHARMA
> <vivek_sharma_at_infosys.com> wrote:
> > Folks
> >
> > Limitations of MSSQL Server Vs. Oracle OR simply otherwise General
> > limitations of MSSQL Server.
> >
> > Need to give a presentation to Management on the same=3D3D3D20
> >
> > Any Good Links, docs etc?
> >
> > Thanks in advance
> >
> > --
> > http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
> >
>=3D3D20
>=3D3D20

> --
> Edgar
> --
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
> --
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>=3D3D20
>

--=3D3D20
Mladen Gogala
Oracle DBA

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Sun Nov 28 2004 - 10:07:16 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US