Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: Toper variable question

Re: Toper variable question

From: Jared Still <jkstill_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 15:10:33 -0800
Message-ID: <bf4638041124151034f8e185@mail.gmail.com>


On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 08:35:07 -0000, Hallas, John, Tech Dev <john.hallas_at_gb.vodafone.co.uk> wrote:
> Isn't the presence of modules one of the great exasberations (sp?) of =
> Perl
> One one hand there seems to be a module for everything, on the other you =
> need to be always down loading new modules.

The alternative would be a monolith.

You don't really want that, do you?

If setup PPM/CPAN so as to install dependant modules, it really isn't that big a deal to install modules.

>
> It amazes me that DBI does not as part of a standard install =
> (Activatestate at least).=20

They are always behind anyway. If possible, use a *nux box for the majority of your Perl work, you will be happier.

-- 
Jared Still
Certifiable Oracle DBA and Part Time Perl Evangelist
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Wed Nov 24 2004 - 17:06:15 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US