From oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org Thu Oct 21 09:03:58 2004 Return-Path: Received: from air189.startdedicated.com (root@localhost) by orafaq.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i9LE3ws11762 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 09:03:58 -0500 X-ClientAddr: 206.53.239.180 Received: from turing.freelists.org (freelists-180.iquest.net [206.53.239.180]) by air189.startdedicated.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i9LE3uI11753 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 09:03:56 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 05B7172CF73; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 09:10:06 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (turing [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 29847-80; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 09:10:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 3035B72CEFE; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 09:10:05 -0500 (EST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=Vc/vY77c/LjLLptDngyinS2Z2nwNR7F7tB1qLzadU0fXGZe2rQLwIkBfeT6z1Bm0NvS/9FC461yM3yprSJf1Nf2W417xdB5bW020cM3NPUFup9Fu8deIZ4a4N0rASKoCz4N3zT+ng08wbw7qvaDlSjh2z08vksCYDFG3A8k02mE= Message-ID: <962cf44b04102107073dda764c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 22:07:53 +0800 From: zhu chao To: bdbafh@gmail.com Subject: Re: Moving to 64-bit Oracle on Solaris 5.8 Cc: gbj@index.is, oracle-l@freelists.org In-Reply-To: <910046b404102013453871ddfe@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit References: <200410202003.i9KK3igl005322@smtp.mmedia.is> <910046b404102013453871ddfe@mail.gmail.com> X-archive-position: 11365 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org Errors-To: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org X-original-sender: zhuchao@gmail.com Precedence: normal Reply-To: zhuchao@gmail.com X-list: oracle-l X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at freelists.org So do the shared_pool_size, as some note says. But I haven't seen you need to double the sort_area_size anywhere. Interesting. Wondering how to verify it.As sort seems more like data buffer other than shared pool, which is 32/64bit related? Thanks. On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 16:45:05 -0400, Paul Drake wrote: > Gudmundur, > > I read (from a good, known source) that you may want to double your > sort_area_size as the pointers will take up twice as much space in > memory. > > I haven't tested this out myself, will do so after I get an AMD 64 laptop. > > Paul > > On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 20:03:44 +0000, Gudmundur Josepsson wrot= > e: > > Hi, > >=20 > > Are there any known 'gotchas' for moving from 32-bit Oracle to 64-bit > > on Solaris 5.8? (Yes, we will RTFM :-) > >=20 > > Thanks, > > Gudmundur > >=20 > > =DEessi p=F3stur var sendur me=F0 vefp=F3sti mi, http://www.mi.is > >=20 > > > > -- > > http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l > > > -- > http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l > -- Regards Zhu Chao www.cnoug.org -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l