Re: Oracle 9i RAC and Data Guard

Nice question. Why did it come up? Why do you want RAC? Because RAC solves an existing problem?
Because you like more complexity (= job-safety)? Because you have left-over budget to spend at the end of the year? Because you expect higher availabilty (is it too low now?)? Because your system is slow and you expect to speed it up deploying RAC? Because Larry says so?
Because of CYA?

Thick any box that is applicable.

In other words: lots of good reasons, if you need one. Without proper background I doubt wether anyone on the list can get more specific, more generic reasons are welcome!

Best regards,

Carel-Jan Engel

===

If you think education is expensive, try ignorance. (Derek Bok)

===

On Wed, 2004-10-20 at 21:09, Alex wrote:

> Hello,
>
> We're running Oracle 9.2.0.5 on Windows 2000. Right now we have databases configured in Data Gurad configuration with primary and stanby instances. The question that came up today was whether it woul be a good idea to migrate to RAC and keep Data Guard. Can someone share their experiences, and info on the advantages/diadvantages, architecture setup, etc on this subject. I've read up quite a bit about DG, but still have to catch up on RAC.
>
> Thanks
>
> ---------------------------------
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we.
>
> --
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l