Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: alert #68 patches

Re: alert #68 patches

From: Walter Montalvo <montalvo2_at_llnl.gov>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 13:10:04 -0700
Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20040930130330.034fea88@mail.llnl.gov>


I think Catherine's point is that V_$PARAMETER was removed from the SELECT privileges for a local role.

So, for instances that have custom roles with grants on V_$PARAMETER, the patch might remove them, breaking the applications/scripts that depend on the role having the proper grants.

This will not show itself as something wrong with the view V_$PARAMETER. It would show itself as objects becoming INVALID after the patch, due to the removal of the grant. However, for scripts, you cannot tell until you run them.

This should be the case on most installations, I would imagine.

Walter

At 11:47 AM 9/30/2004, Jerome Roa wrote:

>I upgraded from 9204 to 9205 and applied the #68 patch and it seems to be OK.
>Sun Solaris. V_$PARAMETER is ok. so is V$PARAMETER
>
>
>At 02:39 PM 9/30/2004 -0400, Catherine LeBlanc wrote:
> >After applying patch 3811887 for alert #68, all of a sudden we had scripts
> >failing. It appears that select on V_$PARAMETER was removed from a local
> >role by the patch. This did not show up in our initial post-patch testing
> >since my group all has SELECT_CATALOG_ROLE which still includes select on
> >V_$PARAMETER.
> >Has anyone else experienced anything like this? We are on 9.2.0.4 on Tru64
> >UNIX.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Catherine LeBlanc
> >
> >--
> >http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>--
>http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Thu Sep 30 2004 - 15:05:41 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US