Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: Shared Pool Tuning

Re: Shared Pool Tuning

From: Terry Sutton <terrysutton_at_usa.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 14:26:48 -0700
Message-ID: <011801c4a5a3$0c9748f0$70f5a8c0@TerrySutton>


Right. If no SQL is getting reused, you're better off with a smaller shared pool. It's a common mistake people make-- increase the shared pool because they're doing a lot of parsing. But your latch problems get worse, and if you're not reusing SQL, it has no benefit.

--Terry
----- Original Message -----

If I recall correctly, hard parse grabs a bunch of latches; and the bigger the shared pool, the worse the latch contention can get. Although it seems counter intuitive, I think, in this case, the piece of duct tape you apply is to REDUCE the size of the shared pool.

>-----Original Message-----
>When the
>shared pool "fills up", all that means is that additional SQL
>which gets
>hard parsed must move some other SQL out of the shared pool.
>This is not a
>problem unless the SQL moved out is needed again.

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l


--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Tue Sep 28 2004 - 16:30:50 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US