Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: Re[2]: Raid5 Vs Raid0+1 -- Raw Vs Solaris 9 Concurrent Direct IO UFS

Re: Re[2]: Raid5 Vs Raid0+1 -- Raw Vs Solaris 9 Concurrent Direct IO UFS

From: <Jared.Still_at_radisys.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2004 14:36:33 -0700
Message-ID: <OF0AEB8EF6.8FECBEA8-ON88256F0A.007686A8-88256F0A.0076B6ED@radisys.com>


> Unless I'm missing something than according to raid specs it doesn't
> mater how many disks are in raid5 array, you just need one additional
> disk for checksums, so in case of 6 spindle array you can create raid5
> that will operate according to your schema (it actually will be two
> raid5 arrays) or you can create one raid5 array that will use 5 disks
> for data and one disk for checksums.
>
> Please, correct me if I'm wrong.
>

It sounds to me like you are describing a RAID volume with dedicated parity. If so, that is RAID 3.

RAID 5 has distributed parity.

RAID 1+0 has no parity. ;)

Jared

--
To unsubscribe - mailto:oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org&subject=unsubscribe 
To search the archives - http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
Received on Thu Sep 09 2004 - 16:33:07 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US