RE: is IPC really faster than TCPIP?

From: Wolfson Larry - lwolfs <lawrence.wolfson_at_acxiom.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2004 20:33:26 -0500
Message-ID: <433A07749711884D8032B6A0AB115262C2BD62@conmsx07.corp.acxiom.net>

Barr, Stephen [Stephen.Barr_at_bskyb.com]

Stephen,

        One of Cary's msgs said IPC and the other mentioned BEQueath. If you can use BEQ it's going to be a hair faster because you don't have to go through the listener. But, either way, if you're processing a row at a time you'll be much faster with BEQ or IPC.

        Should be a no brainer. Why put traffic on your network if you don't have to?

        The other people on the network may appreciate it too.

        Larry

-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org]On Behalf Of Barr, Stephen Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2004 7:48 AM To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: RE: is IPC really faster than TCPIP?

I'd be really interested in hearing the opinions of others on this - we are thinking of implementing IPC on the recommendations of Informatica (our ETL tool). We have a lot of network traffic due to the row-at-a-time processing in informatica.

Informatica and Oracle are both on the same box.

---

The information contained in this communication is confidential, is intended only for the use of the recipient named above, and may be legally privileged. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this communication in error, please re-send this communication to the sender and delete the original message or any copy of it from your computer system. Thank You.

---
To unsubscribe - mailto:oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org&subject=unsubscribe 
To read recent messages - http://freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/09-2004

Received on Thu Sep 02 2004 - 21:07:30 CDT