Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: 10.1.0.3.0 patch running for 2-3 hrs

RE: 10.1.0.3.0 patch running for 2-3 hrs

From: Mark W. Farnham <mwf_at_rsiz.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2004 11:49:51 -0400
Message-ID: <KNEIIDHFLNJDHOOCFCDKKEPJFEAA.mwf@rsiz.com>


I'd didn't scan for re-release of win, but the Linux re-issue was already there a several days ago.

mwf

-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org]On Behalf Of Ron Rogers Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2004 8:03 AM To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: Re: 10.1.0.3.0 patch running for 2-3 hrs

Harvinder
I thought that the 10.1.0.3 for win2k had been retracted by Oracle " We have already obsoleted 10.1.0.3 patch set for these two platforms.  Oracle Development is working on this issue at the highest priority and a corrected version will be reloaded under the same bug number (3761843) very shortly."

Ron

>>> Harvinder.Singh_at_MetraTech.com 09/01/2004 4:23:16 PM >>>
Hi,

We are running patch 10.1.0.3.0 on Win2k and it is running >2-3 hrs without error on step "setting up rdbms required support files patch 10.1.0.3.0"
Is this nor mal or something fuzzy is going on?=20 I can see orawsfix9.exe taking 2-3% cpu constantly

Thanks
--Harvinder



Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com

To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
---
To unsubscribe - mailto:oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org&subject=unsubscribe
To read recent messages - http://freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/09-2004


---
To unsubscribe - mailto:oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org&subject=unsubscribe 
To read recent messages - http://freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/09-2004
Received on Thu Sep 02 2004 - 18:50:29 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US