From oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org Thu Sep 2 16:03:56 2004 Return-Path: Received: from air189.startdedicated.com (root@localhost) by orafaq.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i82L3u125293 for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2004 16:03:56 -0500 X-ClientAddr: 206.53.239.180 Received: from turing.freelists.org (freelists-180.iquest.net [206.53.239.180]) by air189.startdedicated.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i82L3uI25288 for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2004 16:03:56 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id C836672DD47; Thu, 2 Sep 2004 15:16:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (turing [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13014-67; Thu, 2 Sep 2004 15:16:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 50A9272E186; Thu, 2 Sep 2004 14:45:27 -0500 (EST) Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list oracle-l); Thu, 02 Sep 2004 14:43:29 -0500 (EST) X-Original-To: oracle-l@freelists.org Delivered-To: oracle-l@freelists.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 16B2172D9E1 for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2004 11:57:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (turing [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 14428-91 for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2004 11:57:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.acelerate.com (mail.acelerate.com [200.105.128.132]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with SMTP id 4B1A172D8B9 for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2004 10:22:45 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 3175 invoked from network); 2 Sep 2004 15:25:55 -0000 Received: from dazasoftware.com (HELO daza-mgejca5j7t) (200.105.151.94) by 0 with SMTP; 2 Sep 2004 15:25:55 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <41373A44.000001.01276@DAZA-MGEJCA5J7T> Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2004 11:20:36 -0400 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 X-Mailer: IncrediMail (3001487) From: "Juan Carlos Reyes Pacheco" References: <7765c897040902030894987@mail.gmail.com> To: Subject: Re: is IPC really faster than TCPIP? X-FID: PLAINTXT-NONE-0000-0000-000000000000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at freelists.org X-archive-position: 8968 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org Errors-To: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org X-original-sender: jreyes@dazasoftware.com Precedence: normal Reply-To: oracle-l@freelists.org X-list: oracle-l X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at freelists.org Thanks Niall, no matter if Mladen's answer was wrong, the important is she answer one of mail questions Thanks a lot Mladlen , happy I'm . :) Juan Carlos Reyes Pacheco OCP -------Original Message------- From: oracle-l@freelists.org Date: 09/02/04 07:12:44 To: oracle-l@freelists.org Subject: Re: is IPC really faster than TCPIP? On Thu, 2 Sep 2004 00:45:42 -0400 , Gogala, Mladen wrote: > What you really want to implement is CPIP, from RFC 1149, which is fully > described > on the following web page: http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1149.html > Reference implementation is described below: > http://www.blug.linux.no/rfc1149/ I'm disappointed Mladen, no concern for QoS. I'm fairly sure you intended to reference the current reference implementation http://rfc.net/rfc2549.html -- Niall Litchfield Oracle DBA http://www.niall.litchfield.dial.pipex.com --- To unsubscribe - mailto:oracle-l-request@freelists.org&subject=unsubscribe To read recent messages - http://freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/09-2004 --- To unsubscribe - mailto:oracle-l-request@freelists.org&subject=unsubscribe To read recent messages - http://freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/09-2004