RE: RBS in SYSTEM Ts

From: Aragon, Gabriel (GE Commercial Finance) <gabriel.aragon_at_ge.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 17:48:41 -0400
Message-ID: <DA3854DCCE41EA42B603E39691388AC31643BAFD@CINMLVEM05.e2k.ad.ge.com>

Me neither Daniel, tks for the advice! =3D)

Gabriel

-----Original Message-----

From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org]On Behalf Of Daniel W. Fink Sent: Viernes, 06 de Agosto de 2004 03:44 p.m. To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: Re: RBS in SYSTEM Ts

Gabriel,

Keep the system rbs. It is usually small (assuming it is not the only one) and is considered a system object (not something I would mess around with). I don't know that there is internal code that requires the system rbs/undo segment, but I also don't know that all the internal code does not reference it. In all the hacking I've done with undo, the idea of dropping the system undo segment never crossed my mind.

Regards,
Daniel Fink

Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com

To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--

Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/

FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html


-----------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------

Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com


----------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe send email to:  oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org

put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--

Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html

Received on Fri Aug 06 2004 - 16:44:39 CDT