| Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid | |
 |
 | |||
| Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid | |
|
| |||
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: RBS in SYSTEM Ts
If this UNDO ts name matches the name in initSId.ora
undo_tablespace=your_undo_ts_name
then it should be all set.
BTW, here is what I have from my 9i test db:
SQL> select segment_name,owner from dba_rollback_segs;
SEGMENT_NAME OWNER ------------------------------ ------ SYSTEM SYS
_SYSSMU1$ PUBLIC
_SYSSMU2$ PUBLIC
_SYSSMU3$ PUBLIC
_SYSSMU4$ PUBLIC
_SYSSMU5$ PUBLIC
_SYSSMU6$ PUBLIC
_SYSSMU7$ PUBLIC
_SYSSMU8$ PUBLIC
_SYSSMU9$ PUBLIC
_SYSSMU10$ PUBLIC
11 rows selected.
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org]On Behalf Of Aragon, Gabriel (GE
Commercial Finance)
Sent: Friday, August 06, 2004 11:48 AM
To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: RE: RBS in SYSTEM Ts
ok, I didn't see the complete scenary, there's an UNDO ts created, in = that case all the undo operations are redirected to this TS? If so then, = the rbs created on SYSTEM ts is just ignored? or is still a possible = issue and would be better to remove it?
GAP
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org]On Behalf Of Guang Mei
Sent: Viernes, 06 de Agosto de 2004 10:37 a.m.
To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: RE: RBS in SYSTEM Ts
Gabriel:
You are absolutely right. You can ask the DB owner to read some basic =
oracle
docs.
Guang
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org]On Behalf Of Aragon, Gabriel (GE
Commercial Finance)
Sent: Friday, August 06, 2004 11:30 AM
To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: RBS in SYSTEM Ts
Hello list, I just found in the DB that the only RBS created is using =
=3D
the SYSTEM ts, I want to suggest the DB owner to create another TS for =
=3D
RBS operations with 3 or 4 RBS, and not use the SYSTEM ts for these =3D
operations, the reasons I give are that the performance can be affected =
=3D
because the rbs operations are accesing the same TS that the DD and also =
=3D
that the rbs operations can make this ts grow to a huge size, I think =
=3D
those are valid and enough reasons to do it. Am I missing something =3D
else?=3D20
TIA
Gabriel
-- Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html ----------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com ---------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line. -- Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html ----------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com ---------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line. -- Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html ----------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com ---------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line. -- Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html -----------------------------------------------------------------Received on Fri Aug 06 2004 - 11:08:13 CDT
 |
 |