Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Using NetApp Filers for a DWH

RE: Using NetApp Filers for a DWH

From: Mark W. Farnham <mwf_at_rsiz.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 21:54:01 -0400
Message-ID: <KNEIIDHFLNJDHOOCFCDKGEHDFCAA.mwf@rsiz.com>


Just curious -- was the 10g using ASM or ASSM? I'm wondering what statistically distributed data might do to precisely that test. Plus, Baarf.

mwf

-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org]On Behalf Of Mogens Norgaard Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 7:54 PM To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: Re: Using NetApp Filers for a DWH

I like the NetApp guys, etc. But it is really RAID-4 (no kidding), so perhaps that might explain one or two things? Just guessing...

Mogens

Richmond Shee wrote:

> For your second question: The WAFL technology can have a disastrous effect
on full table scans and fast full scans in Oracle10g. You can create this simple mouse trap:-
>
> 1. Create a table and load a bunch of data.
> 2. Flush the buffer cache.
> 3. Enable 10046 at level 8 for the session.
> 4. set timing on
> 5. set db_file_multiblock_read_count = 16
> 6. perform a full table scan against the table. (this is your baseline)
> 7. exit
> 8. login again
> 9. run a procedure that updates the 1st row of every other block (i.e. odd
or even blocks)
> 10. repeat steps 2 to 6. Note the elapsed times and compare the two trace
files.
>
> According to my tests in Oracle10g, many db file sequential read events
showed up in the trace file after the update. I have seen as much as 89% degradation in performance. NetApp blamed this on Oracle as a 10g bug. Oracle kinda admitting it, but until now there is no resolution. However, when the same test was ran in Oracle 9.2.0.4 it didn't produce this problem.



Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com

To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------


----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to:  oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Wed Aug 04 2004 - 20:50:13 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US