Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: Oracle 9.2.0.5 "10046" Tracing Causes Server Crash on Windows 2000?

Re: Oracle 9.2.0.5 "10046" Tracing Causes Server Crash on Windows 2000?

From: Tanel Põder <tanel.poder.003_at_mail.ee>
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2004 20:28:41 +0300
Message-ID: <030601c4797f$54f69470$9c969fd9@porgand>


> The tables are not partitioned but we are using RAID 10 striped and =
> mirrored. Are parallel and partitioning 'locked' together? Is their no =
> value to parallel unless the tables are partitioned? We are moving =
> toward it but haven't done it yet.=20

No, parallel and partitioning are NOT locked together. However, in some cases, using parallel operations on partitioned objects can give additional benefit (partition-wise joins etc..)

Tanel.



Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com

To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Tue Aug 03 2004 - 12:24:37 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US