Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: 10046 event is useless in 9.2.0.4 version for response time m easuring !!!

RE: 10046 event is useless in 9.2.0.4 version for response time m easuring !!!

From: Loughmiller, Greg <greg.loughmiller_at_cingular.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 16:22:55 -0400
Message-ID: <5164A49467308C45AD50661F8CFDC34319200FA0@s30342g004004.wdc.cingular.net>


There are some specific things in 9205 that impact the CBO.. And only if the app seems to lean on certain sql execution plans.. We have several, seems to work ok.. And we have a few where the performance went in the ditch due to differences in the CBO..

greg

-----Original Message-----
From: Jared.Still_at_radisys.com [mailto:Jared.Still_at_radisys.com] Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 4:19 PM
To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: Re: 10046 event is useless in 9.2.0.4 version for response time measuring !!!

> As appears from dictation from this list, to go to 9.2.0.5 is not good
> idea, because of instability and other issues.
Our SAP systems have been on 9.2.0.5 for a couple months now, no issues so far. At least, not oracle related issues.

Jared



Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com

To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------


----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to:  oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Mon Aug 02 2004 - 15:22:38 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US