RE:Annoying full export full import

From: <jo_holvoet_at_amis.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 10:09:30 +0200
Message-id: <OF3BB01E30.00B1C22D-ONC1256EE1.002C91B6@eu.amis.com>

Isn't it due to the underlying tnsnames file being incomplete and not due to the db links themselves not being there ? Ran into the exact same thing myself recently during an exp/imp upgrade from 8.0.5 (!) to 9.2.0.4 (management wanted to use the exp/imp route to have a fallback scenario, i.e. revert back to the 8.0.5 in case of disasters).

mvg/regards

Paula_Stankus_at_doh.state.fl.us
Sent by: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
07/29/2004 18:23
Please respond to oracle-l

        To:     oracle-l_at_freelists.org
        cc: 
        Subject:        RE:Annoying full export full import

Doing a full export from 8.0.6 to import of 9.2.0.4 you would think that = dependencies would be handled correctly.

I found out however that views were created (not even showing up with a = definition and an invalid status) due to database links not being there. = However, the import did do database links at some point. I am running = the import a second time with rows=3Dno hoping to save myself some time.

I thought all permissions are granted/handled through full = export/import. However, a number of permissions to sys. objects were = not. That must be because I ran the full export/import as system - = right? If I had run it under "sys" then that wouldn't have happened = because the permissions would be there? =20

Any suggestions for a cleaner full export/import between 8.0.6 and = 9.2.0.4?

Thanks,
Paula

Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com

To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--

Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html

Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com

Received on Fri Jul 30 2004 - 03:06:22 CDT