RE: SHOULD WE ANALYZE 9.2 SYS tables?

From: Wolfgang Breitling <breitliw_at_centrexcc.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 16:22:33 -0600
Message-Id: <6.1.0.6.2.20040729162125.02f3b878@pop.centrexcc.com>

Yes, as of Oracle 9 it is possible, though still not recommended and from 10 on it is quasi-mandatory (Oracle does it automatically).

At 03:10 PM 7/29/2004, you wrote:
>It's been awhile - but isn't this a NO, never, don't do that kind of =
>thing. Has that changed recently?
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
>[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org]On Behalf Of Jared Still
>Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2004 4:11 PM
>To: Oracle-L Freelists
>Cc: Paul Drake
>Subject: Re: SHOULD WE ANALYZE 9.2 SYS tables?
>
>
>On Thu, 2004-07-29 at 12:50, Paul Drake wrote:
> > i hAD hEARD tHAT iN 10g tHE dICTIONARY iS cOST-bASED
> > aND tHAT tHE sYS sCHEMA sHOULD hAVE sTATISTICS
> > gATHERED fOR iT. dUNNO aBOUT 9.2, nOT cURRENTLY
> > gATHERING sTATS fOR iT.=20
> >=20
> > pD
> >=20
>
>
>hI pAUL,
>
>pERHAPS YOU SHOULD LOOK AT THE SCREEN PRIOR TO PUSHING <send>.
>
>jARED

Regards

Wolfgang Breitling
Centrex Consulting Corporation
www.centrexcc.com

---

Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com

---

To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.

--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Received on Thu Jul 29 2004 - 17:19:30 CDT