Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: X$ changes in 9i

Re: X$ changes in 9i

From: Tanel Põder <tanel.poder.003_at_mail.ee>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 20:03:52 +0300
Message-ID: <37f601c47332$8ba98c00$0a879fd9@porgand>


> Until Oracle can make up their (collective) mind, there will be times that
must be divided by 100
> and there will be times that must be divided by 1000000 and of course
there will be columns that
> will just overflow.

The reason why CPU time is still given in centiseconds, is that Oracle is unable to get CPU usage information in more detailed level than a timeslice controlled by hardware clock and kernel settings, normally 10ms. (This might change with the use of microstate accounting in the future, though).

Btw, when you check the documented views v$system_event and v$session_event, those return wait times in centiseconds regardless of Oracle version (they just divide the wait times by 10000 starting from 9i), it's just the undocumented x$ views which may change between versions and patch levels..

Tanel.



Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com

To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Mon Jul 26 2004 - 12:02:42 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US