| Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid | |
 |
 | |||
| Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid | |
|
| |||
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: Raid 50
<sarcasm>
My mind immediately leapt to the RAID-555 technology; but why stop ther=
e?
The more you RAID-5 it the better the performance, right?
</sarcasm>
Snipped for space -
=
Mogens N=F8rgaard =
<mln To: oracle-l_at_freeli=
sts.org
@miracleas.dk> cc: =
Sent by: Subject: Re: Raid 50 =
oracle-l-bounce =
=
=
07/12/2004 01:34 =
AM =
Please respond =
to oracle-l =
=
=
The BAARF membership template (ie an email to me :) ) is on baarf.com -=
we would like people to submit a statement regarding RAID-F also, but just the name will give them party membership. You, Paul, of course don't need to do this - I've given you membership number 62, which should be visible on the website at some point in the near future :).
What a fantastic concept of RAID-50. I've always loved the idea of selling customers RAID-5 solutions, and then mirror them. With the idea=
of striping across RAID-5 sets, whole new possibilities arise.
For instance, we could mirror this striped RAID-5 idea and get RAID-510=
.
But why stop there? The striping in itself can give problems, so why no=
t
use a more secure striping technlogy, namely RAID-5? So we could start
out RAID-5'ing the RAID-5 sets, thus getting RAID-55. THEN we could
mirror that solution, arriving at the incredible RAID-551 setup.
=
-- Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html -----------------------------------------------------------------Received on Mon Jul 12 2004 - 07:34:21 CDT
 |
 |