Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Difference between count(1) and count(*)

RE: Difference between count(1) and count(*)

From: Ellis R. Miller <sartre1_at_comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 12:47:01 -0600
Message-ID: <AOEDLEKLOHPKBBLDFCLAAEIDDMAA.sartre1@comcast.net>


I will alert the last dozen companies I have consulted for, immediately, as from all indications it sounds as if they may need to stop gathering high-level requirements and move boldly into the second phase: gathering requirements for development training and mentoring i.e. Part I, Successfully unzipping the J2SE 1.4.2 SDK and, Part II, how to find it in the file system (how do you know it really unzipped).

-----Original Message-----

From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org]On Behalf Of DENNIS WILLIAMS Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 11:09 AM
To: 'oracle-l_at_freelists.org'
Subject: RE: Difference between count(1) and count(*)

In the first edition of Corrigan and Gurry's book Oracle Performance Tuning (1993), which covers Version 6 (and Version 7 which was just coming out), they state that they have conducted tests and count(*) consistently runs between 15 and 20 percent faster than count(1). So those of you still doing new development on Version 6 will want to take note of this.

Dennis Williams
DBA
Lifetouch, Inc.
dwilliams_at_lifetouch.com
I said it "looked" clear - Riddick

-----Original Message-----

From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org]On Behalf Of Michael Brown Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 12:06 PM
To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: RE: Difference between count(1) and count(*)

If I remember what Tom Kyte said about it correctly, there was a version where it did make a difference (6, early 7 maybe) and thus a myth was born. According to Tom, the parser is now coded so that count(1) and count(*) use exactly the same code path so any differences you see between the two would occur on multiple runs of the same statement, i.e. they are caused by external events.

-----Original Message-----

From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Peter Miller Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 9:40 AM
To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: RE: Difference between count(1) and count(*)

1,749,951 rows returned in every case

count(rowid) - approx 3.2 secs
count(obj#)  - approx 3.5 secs
count(1)     - approx 3.6 secs
count(*)     - approx 3.6 secs
count(rownum)- approx 4.6 secs
count(source)- approx 8.6 secs

-----Original Message-----

From: Srinivasan Vasan [mailto:Vasan.Srinivasan_at_churchill.com] Sent: 08 July 2004 12:47
To: 'oracle-l_at_freelists.org'
Subject: RE: Difference between count(1) and count(*)

Try the following test (using your own table instead of sys.source$ if = you
wish) on your setup and forever dispel any myths: :-) =20

set trimspool on

set timing on

spool test_count.lst

Prompt Using Sys.Source$ for the test

Prompt

Prompt Row Count using all columns

select count(*) from sys.source$;

Prompt Row Count using a specific numbered column

select count(1) from sys.source$;

Prompt Row Count using the pseudo-column rownum

select max(rownum) from sys.source$;

Prompt Row Count using the ROWID column

select count(rowid) from sys.source$;

Prompt Counting a Not-NULL column

select count(obj#) from sys.source$;

Prompt Counting a NULL column

select count(source) from sys.source$;

spool off

set timing off

set trimspool off

=20

Cheers,=20

=20

Vasan.

-----Original Message-----

From: Jared Still [mailto:jkstill_at_cybcon.com]=20 Sent: 08 July 2004 08:20
To: Oracle-L Freelists
Subject: Re: Difference between count(1) and count(*)

=20

On Wed, 2004-07-07 at 23:28, Lyndon Tiu wrote:

> On Thu, 8 Jul 2004 11:27:28 +0530 oracle-l_at_freelists.org wrote:

> > Dear All,

> > Can you let me know the difference between count(*) and count(1) ?

>=20

> count(1) is supposed to be more efficient and faster.

=20

Notice the qualifier: 'supposed to be'

=20

Was the claim backed up by evidence?

=20

Jared

=20

=20

=20


Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com


To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org

put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.

--

Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/

FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html


-----------------------------------------------------------------
________________________________________________________________________ _= __=20 This email and any attached to it are confidential and intended only for = the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the = intended recipient, please let us know by telephoning or emailing the sender. = You should also delete the email and any attachment from your systems and = should not copy the email or any attachment or disclose their content to any = other person or entity. The views expressed here are not necessarily those of Churchill Insurance Group plc or its affiliates or subsidiaries. Thank = you.=20 Churchill Insurance Group plc. Company Registration Number - 2280426. England.=20 Registered Office: Churchill Court, Westmoreland Road, Bromley, Kent BR1 1DP.=20
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line. -- Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line. -- Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line. -- Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line. -- Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line. -- Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Thu Jul 08 2004 - 12:30:44 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US