RE: Help interpreting 10046 trace file anomaly

From: Aponte, Tony <AponteT_at_hsn.net>
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2004 17:35:43 -0400
Message-ID: <5D48DB5EE592094FBE5373DFF0A4062905D184EB@exchsrv02.stpete.hsn.net>

Sorry for the late reply (playing catch-up after one heck of a month.) The anomaly hasn't been seen in over 1,500 gig of trace files since first occurrence. I'm chucking it to a one-time CPU starvation problem.

Thanks anyway
Tony

-----Original Message-----

From: Daniel Fink [mailto:Daniel.Fink_at_Sun.COM] Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 3:41 PM
To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: Re: Help interpreting 10046 trace file anomaly

Tony,

Some basic questions:
Is this a common problem? Or did it happen just this one time? What is the application configuration?
Would it be possible to get more lines from the trace file?

I'm wondering what consumed the real time between the fetch and the sql*net message. I'm hoping that a few more lines from the trace=20 file might make some sense of it.

Daniel

Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com

To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.

--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html


-----------------------------------------------------------------

Received on Tue Jul 06 2004 - 16:32:30 CDT