Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re[2]: /*+ ULE*/ ???

Re[2]: /*+ ULE*/ ???

From: Robert Eskridge <bryny_at_dfweahs.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 18:49:57 -0500
Message-ID: <15131984281.20040621184957@dfweahs.net>


Thanks!

G> This is a known bug in Oracle which ought to be fixed in 9i.

G> Gudmundur

G> ----- Original Message ----- 
G> From: "Robert Eskridge" <bryny_at_dfweahs.net>
G> To: <oracle-l_at_freelists.org>
G> Sent: Monday, June 21, 2004 11:40 PM
G> Subject: /*+ ULE*/ ???


>> Oracle 8.1.7, Solaris 9.
>>
>> A developer brought me a pl/sql procudure that had a select /*+RULE*/
>> hint in it. It was performing poorly (to the point of blowing out temp
>> space with an ORA-01652 error. When we looked at sql running in
>> v$sqltext, we saw that the hint had changed to /*+ ULE*/.
>>
>> Cutting the select out and and running it in either TOAD or SQL*Plus
>> and performed well. But in the procedure we messed around with it
>> and kept getting the ULE (and the resulting full table scans) until we
>> looked at the docs and put spaces everyhere ( /*+ RULE */ ). Is this
>> well known behavior? I'm wondering if I should scan all our
>> procedures for this syntax....
>>
>> -rje



Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com

To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Mon Jun 21 2004 - 18:46:07 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US