Re: Why RAC link?

From: Niall Litchfield <niall.litchfield_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 14:47:19 +0100
Message-ID: <7765c89704061606473c1a9f7d@mail.gmail.com>

I assume you mean

'You Probably Don't Need RAC'

http://miracleas.dk/WritingsFromMogens/YouProbablyDontNeedRACUSVersion.pdf

I quite like "Why you may not need RAC", but perhaps "Why you may need RAC" would be a better paper.

Cheers

--

Niall Litchfield
Oracle DBA
http://www.niall.litchfield.dial.pipex.com
----- Original Message -----

From: Montgomerie Steve <steve.montgomerie_at_siemens.com> Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 09:40:37 -0400
Subject: Why RAC link?
To: "oracle-l_at_freelists.org" <oracle-l_at_freelists.org>

Just recently
someone posted a link to an opinion as to "Why you may not need RAC" Could someone please
repost the link?

---

Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com

---

To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--

Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html

---

Received on Wed Jun 16 2004 - 08:44:34 CDT