Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: SAP Reorgs

RE: SAP Reorgs

From: Michael Fontana <mfontana_at_verio.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 09:01:30 -0500
Message-ID: <002601c452e1$4284dfa0$380b0a0a@corp.verio.net>


I think we now have anecdotal evidence which proves, in at least these two situations, that someone has assumed that what is good for one or two major rdbms implementations must then of course be good for all.

Michael Fontana
Sr. DBA
NTT/Verio

-----Original Message-----

From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Powell, Mark D Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 8:32 AM
To: 'oracle-l_at_freelists.org'
Subject: RE: SAP Reorgs

The version 8 DB2 UDB manual and the SQL Server 2000 training materials I have been using both recommend object reorganization for performance purposes. The emphasis is on index reorganizations and in a multi-database organization what is a good idea in one db may seem to be a good idea in the others.

There is no substitute for in-depth knowledge of your tool set, but knowledge takes time to accumulate and it can be an uphill battle to convince co-workers to change procedures.

IMHO -- Mark D Powell --



Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com

To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html

-----------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Tue Jun 15 2004 - 08:58:46 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US