RE: RAID

From: Peter Miller <Peter.Miller_at_cogent-dsn.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 12:16:36 +0100
Message-ID: <F9A7789AB548E54E8841E384B0B36F4703A25F37@zaphod.cogent-dsn.local>

RAID 1+0 every time. Can't imagine there is much difference in performance, but 1+0 is more resilient to disk failure

-----Original Message-----

From: Satheesh.Babu_at_iflexsolutions.com
[mailto:Satheesh.Babu_at_iflexsolutions.com] Sent: 15 June 2004 11:32
To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: RAID

List,

        RAID 0+1 or RAID 1+0, which one is better for oltp application. Any pointer could be more useful.

Thanks and Regards,

Satheesh Babu.S

Bangalore.

---

This email, its content and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the addressee(s) and may be legally privileged and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient please delete and contact the sender via email return. Unless expressly stated otherwise, and subject to the disclaimer below, this email does not form part of a legally binding contract or agreement between the recipient and Cogent Defence and Security Networks Ltd.

Messages sent via this medium may be subject to delays, non-delivery and unauthorised alteration. This email has been prepared using information believed by the author to be reliable and accurate, but Cogent Defence and Security Networks Ltd makes no warranty as to accuracy or completeness. In particular, Cogent Defence and Security Networks Ltd does not accept responsibility for changes made to this email after it was sent. Any opinions or recommendations expressed herein are solely those of the author. They may be subject to change without notice.

---

---

Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com

---

To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.

--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html


-----------------------------------------------------------------

Received on Tue Jun 15 2004 - 06:26:42 CDT