Re: To set events or not set events, that is the question

comments as always
On Mon, 14 Jun 2004 16:06:33 -0600, Daniel Fink <daniel.fink_at_sun.com> wrote:
>
> I can't speak for Oracle (nor Sun), but my take is that often these events are set for a specific purpose, then the reason for
> setting them disappears into the mist of time. I love the ones that reference a TAR that you can no longer view and Support can't
> tell you why. Anytime a new version (even a bug fix) is installed, the event may cause new problems.

I agree entirely.

>
> If there is any other way to deal with a problem, I would definitely do it.

And there is....

You can log the errors and associated statements, plus lots of other goodies if you want to a table using a trigger and the system events that are (I think) new in 9. It also has the advantage that you can change what events you monitor, or enable/disable monitoring without bouncing the database.

I have an example set of scripts on my site (utility for trapping arbitrary server errors or some such wording) . Naturally since I wrote the script we haven't had a single 1652 (which we were looking for) but you'll get the idea.

-- 
Niall Litchfield
Oracle DBA
http://www.niall.litchfield.dial.pipex.com

P.S. Dan - you might like to check out the creative commons licensing
for your intellectual property questions.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to:  oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------