Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: BEWARE 9.2.0.5 64-BIT SOLARIS 2.9

RE: BEWARE 9.2.0.5 64-BIT SOLARIS 2.9

From: Chris Stephens <ChrisStephens_at_Affina.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 14:25:05 -0500
Message-ID: <E07BCCA62696AB40BE1267A7419A281A2B5148@apollo.affina.net>


This is fun to read as I wait for oui to finish applying the 9205 patchset.

Oh well...it is our development machine, it is an HP 11 box, and I have cma (covered my a$$).

chris

-----Original Message-----

From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of DENNIS WILLIAMS Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 2:10 PM
To: 'oracle-l_at_freelists.org'
Subject: RE: BEWARE 9.2.0.5 64-BIT SOLARIS 2.9

Paula

   My experience, having worked for software vendors, is that you are correct. Patchsets generally get a "modest" amount of regression testing, at
best. Just to cheer you up, individual patches may receive practically no
regression testing.

Dennis Williams
DBA
Lifetouch, Inc.
dwilliams_at_lifetouch.com

-----Original Message-----

From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org]On Behalf Of Paula_Stankus_at_doh.state.fl.us
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 11:56 AM
To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: RE:BEWARE 9.2.0.5 64-BIT SOLARIS 2.9

Guys,

I don't know if you remember but I complained earlier about ORA-07445, ORA-0600 errors, database crashing, trace files being generated on :

sql loader processes
moving tables
imports

It was a bug we faced with 9.2.0.5 and it required "based on the bug number"
getting the one-off patch. Of course, that was also fun as the one-off patch instructs you to use the PERL installed with Oracle (which didn't work
we ended up using /usr/bin/perl with success) - installing the opatch software, etc. BTW, I did look to see first if the patchset 9.2.0.6 was out......so.....

I wondered if Oracle even does regression testing anymore because this problem was not present with 9.2.0.4.

BEWARE - EITHER GO TO 9.2.0.4 OR WAIT TILL 9.2.0.6 would be my advice ESPECIALLY IF YOU ARE RUNNING 64-BIT ORACLE ON SOLARIS 2.9



Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com

To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--

Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html

-----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--

Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html

-----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--

Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
Received on Mon Jun 14 2004 - 14:22:05 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US