RE: SQL Server vs. Oracle

From: Eng, Doug MSER:EX <Doug.Eng_at_gems3.gov.bc.ca>
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 09:11:58 -0700
Message-ID: <2BDEFE6709A79945A9516485AB1F97C10B769D@bevy.idir.bcgov>

Moving off the April 1, 2004 publication date would help its credibility.

Doug

-----Original Message-----

From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org [mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Leslie Tierstein
Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 5:23 PM
To: oracle-l
Subject: SQL Server vs. Oracle

See:
http://www.progstrat.com/research/gems/040401rdbmscmcs.pdf

The poster on the SQL Server list where I found this reference was astonished that the report would find that 10g was easier to configure and administer than SQL Server.

Leslie Tierstein
Senior Consultant
Vision Chain, Inc.
The Standard for Demand Data Networks
phone: 202-261-3549

---

Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com

---

To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--

Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/

FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html


-----------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------

Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com


----------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe send email to:  oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org

put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--

Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html

---

Received on Wed Jun 02 2004 - 11:09:36 CDT