Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: UNDO poll - was undo segments vs. rbs

RE: UNDO poll - was undo segments vs. rbs

From: John Kanagaraj <john.kanagaraj_at_hds.com>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 14:12:43 -0700
Message-ID: <35CFD500D7BDCE43B9030BBA5979DC18015A3666@ussccem13.hds.com>


Larry,

> I haven't seen any, but don't UNDO 1555s get written to
>alert log
>now?
>
>!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>This is no doubt dependent on environment. If we get ORa-1555,
>they're never reported to me.
>
>I don't manage RBS. I don't do anything with them, they seem
>to work fine as is.

1555s (and 4031 and 1652s as well) do not get automatically written into alert log, as they are considered 'User errors' (for whatever clueless reason!). You can enable that though by inserting the following 'event' entries into your init.ora

event="1555 trace name errorstack level 3"
event="4031 trace name errorstack level 3"
event="1652 trace name processstate level 10"

Note though, that you will have to keep *all* event lines TOGETHER in the init.ora lines, otherwise only the last ones will take effect. (Same problem with multiple utl_file_dir lines!)

Hth,
John Kanagaraj <><
DB Soft Inc
Phone: 408-970-7002 (W)

Disappointment is inevitable, but Discouragement is optional!

Received on Thu May 20 2004 - 16:05:20 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US