| Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid | |
 |
 | |||
| Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid | |
|
| |||
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: RAC and LMT
Lies, damned lies and LMT's. :)
Whoever told you LMT's were a requirement was wrong. A damn good idea, yes= , but not a requirement.
I haven't played with it much, but I remember hearing from Howard Rogers th= at the procedure you referred to left a certain amount to be desired from a= fragmentation perspective. Can't recall the details, but if you googled o=n c.d.o.s you'd find it.
As an aside, you don't need to export/import to achieve what you want. Mov= e the objects online instead if that's preferable.
=
Pete
=
"Controlling developers is like herding cats."
Kevin Loney, Oracle DBA Handbook
=
"Oh no, it's not. It's much harder than that!" Bruce Pihlamae, long-term Oracle DBA
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org [mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] =
On Behalf Of todd.sheetz_at_aurora.org
Sent: Thursday, 20 May 2004 6:50 AM
To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: RAC and LMT
We are currently on Oracle 8.1.7.3 on VMS and are starting the planning to = =
upgrade to 9.2.0.5 later this year. Early next year we are planning on =
implementing RAC. I have heard/read that LMT are required for RAC. We =
are currently on dictionary managed per vendor mandate but will be able to = =
use LMT by the time we go to RAC. My (long winded) question is whether =
the DBMS_SPACE_ADMIN.TABLEPSACE_MIGRATE_TO_LOCAL is good enough to =
implement LMT for RAC. I understand that we won't have all the positives =
of LMT, but we are currently at 1.75 terabytes and I would not be looking =
forward to exporting and importing it tablespace by tablespace. Any thoughts or comments are greatly appreciated!
Thanks
Todd Sheetz
Senior Database Administrator
Aurora Health Care
Who's the more foolish? The fool or the fool who follows him. -- Obi-Wan =
Kenobi
 |
 |