RE: 9205 Query behavior

From: Wolfgang Breitling <breitliw_at_centrexcc.com>
Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 10:15:52 -0600
Message-Id: <6.1.0.6.2.20040517101334.02984a48@pop.centrexcc.com>

When trying out hints I only focused on no_unnest and totally forgot about no_merge which should have been the more obvious one. That is consistent with the result I got using the rownum pseudo-column which also prevents merging.

At 09:57 AM 5/17/2004, you wrote:
>Well I just figured that NO_MERGE hint takes care of the "problem" ..
>You get the right results ...
>Raj

regards

Wolfgang Breitling
Centrex Consulting Corporation
www.centrexcc.com

---

Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com

---

To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.

--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Received on Mon May 17 2004 - 11:14:18 CDT