RE: 10g easier to administer than MS SQL

From: Jesse, Rich <Rich.Jesse_at_quadtechworld.com>
Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 09:18:37 -0500
Message-ID: <FBE1FCA40ECAD41180400050DA2BC54004E93954@qtiexch2.qgraph.com>

I don't know. Any paper that says to monitor a system, "Set threshold = for Buffer Cache Hit (%)", I'll treat as suspect.

:)

Rich

Rich Jesse                        System/Database Administrator
rich.jesse_at_quadtechworld.com      QuadTech, Sussex, WI USA

> -----Original Message-----
> From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
> Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 7:48 AM
> Subject: 10g easier to administer than MS SQL
>=20
>=20
> The following article summarizes an independent study of=20
> administrative
> effort between 10g and SQL Server:
>
> The study itself can be found at:
> <http://www.progstrat.com/research/gems/040401rdbmscmcs.pdf>.

---

Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com

---

To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.

--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Received on Wed May 12 2004 - 09:17:13 CDT