RE: XML databases

From: Richard Ji <Richard.Ji_at_ztango.com>
Date: Sat, 8 May 2004 11:28:36 -0400
Message-ID: <E1732F21A9B99440B2117A3BEC76B91D01411A@ztangousexch.ad.ztango.com>

True, but it is the latest that MS is offering since they keep on delaying their products. For those who paid 3 years subscription but get nothing, I wonder if that still makes SQL server cheap.

-----Original Message-----

From:	Jacques Kilchoer [mailto:Jacques.Kilchoer_at_quest.com]
Sent:	Fri 5/7/2004 8:38 PM
To:	oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Cc:	
Subject:	RE: XML databases

To be fair, they are comparing a just-released version of Oracle with a version of SQL Server that is almost four years old.=20

-----Original Message-----

Jared.Still_at_radisys.com

Infoworld has a nice comparison article on the top 4 RDBMS's and their ability to work with XML data. http://www.infoworld.com/article/04/04/23/17FExml_1.html

Probably no surprise that Oracle came out on the top, and MS SQL Server came out on the bottom.

As with the Internet in general, Microsoft got started too late with XML, and SQL Server is evidence of that.

Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com

To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--

Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html

Binary/unsupported file stripped by Ecartis --
Type: application/ms-tnef
File: winmail.dat

Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com

Received on Sat May 08 2004 - 10:25:59 CDT