I think that's a recent addition though. I remeber an OakTable discussion about this when we were
testing 'drop' on lmt's in 8 and 9.0, the tsq$ update occurred for every extent dropped, and this
was enhanced in 9.2 to be just once at the end of the drop
Cheers
Connor
- Jonathan Lewis <jonathan_at_jlcomp.demon.co.uk> wrote: >
> I think this is one that probably requires testing
> for every platform and version of Oracle.
>
> I've just run a quick test on 9.2.0.4 with 169 extents
> in an LMT Uniform sized.
>
> The most significant difference is that the TRUNCATE
> updated tsq$ once per extent removed, DROP updated
> tsq$ once at the end. On the other hand, the DROP
> command triggered various other (mostly small) actions,
> including a call to a procedure called aw_drop_proc.
>
> The most significant difference, though, was the handling
> of tsq$, and it made the truncate much more expensive
> in undo and redo.
>
> Regards
>
> Jonathan Lewis
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
Connor McDonald
Co-author: "Mastering Oracle PL/SQL - Practical Solutions"
ISBN: 1590592174
web:
http://www.oracledba.co.uk
web:
http://www.oaktable.net
email: connor_mcdonald_at_yahoo.com
Coming Soon! "Oracle Insight - Tales of the OakTable"
"GIVE a man a fish and he will eat for a day. But TEACH him how to fish, and...he will sit in a boat and drink beer all day"
Yahoo! Messenger - Communicate instantly..."Ping"
your friends today! Download Messenger Now
http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com/download/index.html
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ:
http://www.orafaq.com
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Thu May 06 2004 - 22:47:45 CDT