Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: Why "Separating Data and Indexes improves performance" is a myth?

Re: Why "Separating Data and Indexes improves performance" is a myth?

From: Jonathan Lewis <jonathan_at_jlcomp.demon.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 18:13:44 +0100
Message-ID: <002701c42956$558c97a0$7102a8c0@Primary>

And an old truism - which I think I first ran up the flagpole during v6 days:

    20 inserts might go into just one table block

    20 inserts could easily mean 60 scattered index block     updates because you have 3 indexes on the table.

    Ulimate Write ratio: 60 to 1

    The last thing you want in some heavy duty write systems     is to separate index physical devices from table physical     devices. (note the hair-splitting description).

Regards

Jonathan Lewis
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk

The Co-operative Oracle Users' FAQ
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/faq/ind_faq.html

April 2004 Iceland http://www.index.is/oracleday.php June 2004 UK - Optimising Oracle Seminar July 2004 USA West Coast, Optimising Oracle Seminar August 2004 Charlotte NC, Optimising Oracle Seminar September 2004 USA East Coast, Optimising Oracle Seminar September2004 UK - Optimising Oracle Seminar

What matters is the performance of your system under load. If you have 10 disks in
a RAID 0 with all indexes and data residing on it and the performance is somewhat
lackluster, splitting those disks into two 5 disk RAID 0 drives and physically separating
the indexes and data will not improve performance.

It would be very likely though that it would decrease performance, particularly on
full table scans and fast full index scans.

Jared



Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com

To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--

Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
Received on Fri Apr 23 2004 - 12:10:46 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US