From oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org Fri Apr 23 12:02:05 2004 Return-Path: Received: from air189.startdedicated.com (root@localhost) by orafaq.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i3NH1cI23434 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 12:01:48 -0500 X-ClientAddr: 206.53.239.180 Received: from turing.freelists.org (freelists-180.iquest.net [206.53.239.180]) by air189.startdedicated.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i3NH1R623414 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 12:01:37 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 66F0172D202; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 11:51:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (turing [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13453-41; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 11:51:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 8DCDC72D042; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 11:50:55 -0500 (EST) Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list oracle-l); Fri, 23 Apr 2004 11:49:41 -0500 (EST) X-Original-To: oracle-l@freelists.org Delivered-To: oracle-l@freelists.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id E29CF72CDF3 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 11:49:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (turing [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 12534-56 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 11:49:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from qescan1.qgraph.com (QESCAN2.qgraph.com [206.158.124.8]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 4697672CD1F for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 11:49:38 -0500 (EST) Received: by sxsmtp1.qgraph.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) id ; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 11:59:38 -0500 Message-ID: From: "Jesse, Rich" To: "'oracle-l@freelists.org'" Subject: RE: anyone using rac on vcs DBED/AC? Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 11:59:37 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at freelists.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-archive-position: 3659 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org Errors-To: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org X-original-sender: Rich.Jesse@quadtechworld.com Precedence: normal Reply-To: oracle-l@freelists.org X-list: oracle-l X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at freelists.org What do you mean by "binding"? If the routing is setup correctly (e.g. 192.168 subnet routes to the private NICs, with a default), order shouldn't matter, should it? Disclaimer: I'm obviously not a networking specialist... Rich Rich Jesse System/Database Administrator rich.jesse@quadtechworld.com QuadTech, Sussex, WI USA > -----Original Message----- > From: Jared.Still@radisys.com [mailto:Jared.Still@radisys.com] > Sent: Friday, April 23, 2004 11:50 AM > To: oracle-l@freelists.org > Subject: RE: anyone using rac on vcs DBED/AC? > > > Why does the private nic not have an IP? It should . Also > ensure thet once > the private nic's have IP's > that the binding order is such that the public IP's are loaded first. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com ---------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line. -- Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html -----------------------------------------------------------------