Re: CPU COSTING

From: Jonathan Lewis <jonathan_at_jlcomp.demon.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 09:22:52 +0100
Message-ID: <013d01c4290c$31450610$7102a8c0@Primary>

Re-reading my post, it's not obvious that I approve of CPU costing and think it should be enabled as part of the migration plan from 8 to 9; so I'll just say it clearly:

"I approve of CPU costing and think it should be enabled as part of the migration plan from 8 to 9"

The fact that it will cause some surprises and confusion occasionally is unfortunate.

One guideline when you've got some system statistics gathered. If you've adjusted optimizer_index_cost_adj, set it back to default, otherwise you've effectively told Oracle twice that single block reads are cheaper than multiblock reads. (This was the point of the throwaway comment I made about Oracle 9 in my DBAZine article on OICA).

Regards

Jonathan Lewis
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk

The Co-operative Oracle Users' FAQ
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/faq/ind_faq.html

April 2004 Iceland http://www.index.is/oracleday.php June 2004 UK - Optimising Oracle Seminar July 2004 USA West Coast, Optimising Oracle Seminar August 2004 Charlotte NC, Optimising Oracle Seminar September 2004 USA East Coast, Optimising Oracle Seminar September2004 UK - Optimising Oracle Seminar

Original Message ----- From: "Wolfson Larry - lwolfs" <lawrence.wolfson_at_acxiom.com> To: <oracle-l_at_freelists.org> Sent: Friday, April 23, 2004 12:38 AM Subject: RE: CPU COSTING

Jonathan, thanks for heads up.

Tanel, by freaked out, I assume you mean performing at warp speed.

Thanks
Larry Wolfson.

Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com

To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--

Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html

Received on Fri Apr 23 2004 - 03:20:02 CDT