Re: Application of logfiles

From: Robert Blok <robert.blok_at_xs4all.nl>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 12:59:45 +0200
Message-ID: <4087A5A1.4020503@xs4all.nl>

Hi biti_rainy,

Am I correct that all your archives are from the same node?

Your previous statement that it doesn't apply them if the archives are empty, may be correct. That's what I assumed as well.

I will use logminer to examine the logfiles here to see whether there is a SCN in them (there should be). That's the reason why you have to apply the "empty" archives.

Rgds,
Robert.

biti_rainy wrote:

>
>
>
> logfile header take 2 blocks ,1024 bytes.
> 1536 - 1024 =3D 512 ,one os block or one redo log block .
> one backgroud process write something , maybe it is no useful=
> logging . such as the process generate SCN ...
>
> i have met one intresting things,i create the controlfile and =
> do a incomplete recovery from rac DB,
> the archived logs from rac1 and rac2
> i notice that recovery do not use rac1's archived log x ,but=
> i must apply the rac1's archived log x .
> then it switch to rac2's archived log and the SCN is not=
> increment . i guess the archived log x
> "have no useful redo" but it need it.

Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com

To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.

--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Received on Thu Apr 22 2004 - 05:55:35 CDT