Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: cost

Re: cost

From: Tanel Põder <tanel.poder.003_at_mail.ee>
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2004 11:16:32 +0300
Message-ID: <00c301c41baf$79734240$b6a623d5@porgand>


> My guess would be that this is a deliberate
> heuristic introduced some time around 9
> to avoid nested loop full tablescans when
> the numbers are small.

I wonder could this behaviour be changed with _new_initial_join_orders parameter? (Don't have a chance to test it myself right now)

Tanel.



Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com

To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Tue Apr 06 2004 - 03:12:58 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US