Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: hash partitioning

RE: hash partitioning

From: Jacques Kilchoer <Jacques.Kilchoer_at_quest.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 16:52:59 -0800
Message-ID: <B5C5F99D765BB744B54FFDF35F602621033DAF76@irvmbxw02>


Why are you partitioning the table?
To break up the size of the table so that each partition has a size less than X GB? To make sure that each portion of a local partitioned index has a lower blevel? To make maintenance operations more manageable because you can do things (like moving to a different tablespace) a single partition at a time? To be able to use parallelism and spread the work across several disks on bulk loads? Because you've paid for the feature and you figure that it would be a shame not to use it?

> -----Original Message-----
> thump604_at_comcast.net
>
> How does one determine the optimal number of partitions when
> setting up a hash partitioned table?
> -David



Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com

To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Fri Mar 26 2004 - 18:56:58 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US