Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: Oracle 911 Article/Sarbanes Oxley

Re: Oracle 911 Article/Sarbanes Oxley

From: Nuno Souto <dbvision_at_optusnet.com.au>
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 18:44:37 +1100
Message-ID: <015101c404e2$8a37cfd0$9b00a8c0@dcs001>


Isn't that what accounting audits were invented for? Or is that not mandatory Stateside? Here, every public company has to explain why it doesn't need an audit. Small companies get away with it. Big ones blame IT.

Cheers
Nuno Souto
in sunny Sydney, Australia
dbvision_at_optusnet.com.au
----- Original Message -----
From: <Jared.Still_at_radisys.com>
> The Sarbanes-Oxley Act is not a fad.
>
> It is legislation enacted in the US in 2002 that requires public companies
> with capitalization of 75M+ to actually be able to ( gasp!) make an case
> for the accuracy of their financial records.
>
> There are provisions in SOA to send the CEO and/or CFO to prison
> should hanky panky with the books lead to a fleecing of investors.
>
> IT is very much involved with this.



Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com

To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Mon Mar 08 2004 - 01:50:43 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US