From oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org Sun Mar 7 19:59:34 2004 Return-Path: Received: from air189.startdedicated.com (root@localhost) by orafaq.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i281xYr25968 for ; Sun, 7 Mar 2004 19:59:34 -0600 X-ClientAddr: 206.53.239.180 Received: from turing.freelists.org (freelists-180.iquest.net [206.53.239.180]) by air189.startdedicated.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i281xXo25963 for ; Sun, 7 Mar 2004 19:59:34 -0600 Received: from turing (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 95931394DAC; Sun, 7 Mar 2004 20:59:35 -0500 (EST) Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list oracle-l); Sun, 07 Mar 2004 20:58:02 -0500 (EST) X-Original-To: oracle-l@freelists.org Delivered-To: oracle-l@freelists.org Received: from smtp.vip.163.com (smtp.vip.163.com [202.106.168.106]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 255C0394D48 for ; Sun, 7 Mar 2004 20:57:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.vip.163.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 6E0F060ED for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 10:01:40 +0800 (CST) Received: from chaos (unknown [220.248.5.118]) by 202.106.168.106 (Coremail:vip.163.com) with SMTP id CwEAAALUS0AgPAV2.1 for ; Mon, 08 Mar 2004 10:01:40 +0800 (CST) X-TEBIE-Originating-IP: [220.248.5.118] Message-ID: <002301c404b1$44162140$9005a8c0@chaos> From: "zhu chao" To: References: <001601c404ae$98246880$dd00a8c0@prem> Subject: Re: 0% data loss setup ? Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 10:01:25 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-archive-position: 53 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org Errors-To: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org X-original-sender: chao_ping@vip.163.com Precedence: normal Reply-To: oracle-l@freelists.org X-list: oracle-l You can also try hardware remote-mirror product provided by Array vendor. But in real sync mode, there is also many constraint and performance hurts, and much higher cost. You can configure more than 1 standby, for example, to provent the standby single point of failure. Regards Zhu Chao ----- Original Message ----- From: "Prem Khanna J" To: "Freelists" Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 9:42 AM Subject: 0% data loss setup ? > Hi List, > > We will be soon having a system and it requires > strictly 0% data loss in any case . Not even a > single commited transaction should be lost. > > The setup will be 9iR2 on win2k . > > Standby database (max protection mode) may be a > choice.But the primary DB tends to go down if it > is not able to communicate with standby DB.this > reduces the availability of my primary DB and so > is not my option.And standby database in ( max > availability mode) can have data loss and hence > is ruled out. > > any HA suggestion ?! > can someone let me know how it can be acheived ? > > Regards, > Prem. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@freelists.org > put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line. > -- > Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ > FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com ---------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line. -- Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html -----------------------------------------------------------------