Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: 0% data loss setup ?

Re: 0% data loss setup ?

From: zhu chao <chao_ping_at_vip.163.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 10:01:25 +0800
Message-ID: <002301c404b1$44162140$9005a8c0@chaos>


You can also try hardware remote-mirror product provided by Array vendor. But in real sync mode, there is also many constraint and performance hurts, and much higher cost.
You can configure more than 1 standby, for example, to provent the standby single point of failure.

Regards
Zhu Chao

> Hi List,
>
> We will be soon having a system and it requires
> strictly 0% data loss in any case . Not even a
> single commited transaction should be lost.
>
> The setup will be 9iR2 on win2k .
>
> Standby database (max protection mode) may be a
> choice.But the primary DB tends to go down if it
> is not able to communicate with standby DB.this
> reduces the availability of my primary DB and so
> is not my option.And standby database in ( max
> availability mode) can have data loss and hence
> is ruled out.
>
> any HA suggestion ?!
> can someone let me know how it can be acheived ?
>
> Regards,
> Prem.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org
> put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
> --
> Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
> FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>



Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com

To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Sun Mar 07 2004 - 19:59:34 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US