Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: parse/execute ratio
That's certainly a possibility Raj.....but I like to think about these things a bit and see if I can't think my way through to a solution. Too often, assuming Oracle screwed up (and they certainly do, fairly regularly) can lead to errors or misunderstandings.
-Mark
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org]
Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2004 2:30 PM
To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: RE: parse/execute ratio
coding error .... perhaps??
Raj
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org]On Behalf Of Bobak, Mark
Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2004 2:25 PM
To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: RE: parse/execute ratio
Hmm...hadn't thought of that. I did some quick poking around, and a quick IxOra reference. That seems to be absolutely true.
I did find a few counterexamples, though, I think. If LOADS is hard parses and PARSE_CALLS is total parses, then why do I have rows in V$SQL where LOADS > PARSE_CALLS?
Any thoughts, Tanel? (Or anyone else?)
Hmm....a slightly closer look at those SQLs, and they all seem to be recursive SQL. Not sure what's going on there.
-Mark
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.htmlput 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org