From oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org Tue Mar 2 08:15:49 2004 Return-Path: Received: from air189.startdedicated.com (root@localhost) by orafaq.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i22EFn332562 for ; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 08:15:49 -0600 X-ClientAddr: 206.53.239.180 Received: from turing.freelists.org (freelists-180.iquest.net [206.53.239.180]) by air189.startdedicated.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i22EFno32553 for ; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 08:15:49 -0600 Received: from turing (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id C0453394D65; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 09:16:24 -0500 (EST) Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list oracle-l); Tue, 02 Mar 2004 09:15:17 -0500 (EST) X-Original-To: oracle-l@freelists.org Delivered-To: oracle-l@freelists.org Received: from web25003.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (web25003.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.12.10.39]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with SMTP id 60BCF394CF5 for ; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 09:15:14 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <20040302141855.11943.qmail@web25003.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Received: from [217.158.168.199] by web25003.mail.ukl.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 02 Mar 2004 14:18:55 GMT Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 14:18:55 +0000 (GMT) From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Zabair=20Ahmed?= Subject: Strange behaviour To: oracle-l@freelists.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-616614449-1078237135=:10939" X-archive-position: 6 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org Errors-To: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org X-original-sender: roon987@yahoo.co.uk Precedence: normal Reply-To: oracle-l@freelists.org X-list: oracle-l --0-616614449-1078237135=:10939 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 9.2.0.4 on HP 11.11 Has anyone seen the following:- $ sqlplus /nolog SQL*Plus: Release 9.2.0.4.0 - Production on Tue Mar 2 14:11:40 2004 Copyright (c) 1982, 2002, Oracle Corporation. All rights reserved. SQL> connect / as sysdba Connected. SQL> select * from v$dataguard_status; select * from v$dataguard_status * ERROR at line 1: ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kcrrac.1], [1919117420], [12849], [], [], [], [], [] SQL> Am getting the above error on the primary database. But the interesting thing is that the standby database is keeping uptodate with the primary database, all the logs are applied successfully with no lag. Has anyone come across such a scenerio. TIA --------------------------------- Yahoo! Messenger - Communicate instantly..."Ping" your friends today! Download Messenger Now --0-616614449-1078237135=:10939 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
9.2.0.4 on HP 11.11
 
Has anyone seen the following:-
 
 
$ sqlplus /nolog
SQL*Plus: Release 9.2.0.4.0 - Production on Tue Mar 2 14:11:40 2004
Copyright (c) 1982, 2002, Oracle Corporation.  All rights reserved.
SQL> connect / as sysdba
Connected.
SQL> select * from v$dataguard_status;
select * from v$dataguard_status
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kcrrac.1], [1919117420], [12849],
[], [], [], [], []

SQL>
Am getting the above error on the primary database.
But the interesting thing is that the standby database is keeping uptodate with the primary database, all the logs are applied successfully with no lag.
 
Has anyone come across such a scenerio.
 
TIA
 

Yahoo! Messenger - Communicate instantly..."Ping" your friends today! Download Messenger Now --0-616614449-1078237135=:10939-- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com ---------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line. -- Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html -----------------------------------------------------------------