Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: ora-12500 on windows

RE: ora-12500 on windows

From: Paul Drake <discgolfdba_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 11:39:20 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <20040218193920.19370.qmail@web20420.mail.yahoo.com>

Lisa,

we use shared servers in 9.2 on w2k adv svr for a very specific usage condition: where a VPN only has certain ports open.

recently, a client site rebuilt a citrix server, and did not restore the old tnsnames.ora file.

as a result, instead of obtaining dedicated server processes, 1/3rd of their sessions from their citrix farm were accessing shared servers.

it was fatal (to the instance, not to me).

It will depend upon your environment, but parsing with shared servers being used is not viable. If the code is lightweight and does not parse, you have a chance.

shared servers use a longer code path, and critical resources (such as the library_cache latch or shared_pool latch) may experience greatly increased contention.

as far as large memory support,
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;283037 "Large Memory Support Is Available in Windows 2000 and Windows Server 2003"

the addition of /3GB (possibly /PAE) in the boot.ini should take care of it. you can verify that these were read properly in the registry, under boot options.

win32 does not support the use of prespawned connections. I have not mucked with connection pooling.
are you using pga_aggregate_target?

hth.

Pd

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeffrey Beckstrom
> [mailto:JBECKSTROM_at_gcrta.org]=20
> Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 12:55 PM
> To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org; discgolfdba_at_yahoo.com
> Subject: Re: ora-12500 on windows
>
> we are w2k AS. Do you know the metalink note for
> large memory support?
> >>> discgolfdba_at_yahoo.com 2/18/04 11:11:20 AM >>>
> --- Jeffrey Beckstrom <JBECKSTROM_at_gcrta.org> wrote:
> > mem usage
>
> familiar territory.
>
> on win32, the process memory limit is between 1.7
> and
> 1.8 GB of virtual memory. what version of operating
> system is the server running?
>
> if it is w2k server, you're stuck. you must reduce
> either the SGA or PGA memory allocations in order to
> stay under the process limit.
> if it is w2k advanced server, you can enable large
> memory support, and carry up to a 3*10E9 (convert to
> power of 2) memory allocated to a process.
>
> if is is w2k3 server, you can enable large memory
> support.
> certain versions of Oracle on win32 support large
> memory, and some don't.
> 9.2.0.4 does.
> 8.1.7.3 and 8.1.7.4 do not.
>
> to reduce memory allocations, you might:
> - check v$sgastat for free memory, and reduce the
> size
> of the shared, large and java pools.
> - reduce the buffer cache
> - reduce sort_area_size, hash_area_size
>
> hth.
>
> Pd
>
> > I would suspect they should be close to each other
> > since currently mem usage is 1.1 g and vm size is
> > 1.2 g.
> > >>> tanel.poder.003_at_mail.ee 2/18/04 9:17:39 AM >>>
> >=20
> > > oracle.exe process was 1.4 G per task manager -
> > well under the 2 G
> > > limit.
> >=20
> > I've seen problems starting happen when about 1,5G
> > of mem was allocated to
> > oracle.exe... From which task manager column did
> you
> > check the process size,
> > from "mem usage" or from "vm size"?
> >=20
> > Tanel.
> >=20
> >=20
> > > Swap space is set to max of 4 G
> > > commit charge peak is 2.4 G
> > > commit charge limit is 5.8 G
> > > We should be well under the limits
> > >
> > > Jeffrey Beckstrom
> > > Database Administrator
> > > Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority
> > > 1240 W. 6th Street
> > > Cleveland, Ohio 44113
> > >
> > >
> >=20
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard - Read only the mail you want.
> http://antispam.yahoo.com/tools=20

>



> Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ:
> http://www.orafaq.com=20

>

> To unsubscribe send email to:
> oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org=20
> put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
> --
> Archives are at
> http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/=20
> FAQ is at

>
http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html=20 >

>
>
>

>

> Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ:
> http://www.orafaq.com

>

> To unsubscribe send email to:
> oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org
> put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
> --
> Archives are at
> http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
> FAQ is at
> http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
>

>
> "The sender believes that this E-Mail and any
> attachments were free of =
> any virus, worm, Trojan horse, and/or malicious code
> when sent. This =
> message and its attachments could have been infected
> during =
> transmission. By reading the message and opening
> any attachments, the =
> recipient accepts full responsibility for taking
> proactive and remedial =
> action about viruses and other defects. The sender's
> business entity is =
> not liable for any loss or damage arising in any way
> from this message =
> or its attachments."
>

>

> Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ:
> http://www.orafaq.com

>

> To unsubscribe send email to:
> oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org
> put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
> --
> Archives are at
> http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
> FAQ is at
> http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
>


Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard - Read only the mail you want. http://antispam.yahoo.com/tools

Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com

To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Wed Feb 18 2004 - 13:39:20 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US