Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: SAP Service Report / EarlyWatch Check usefulness?

Re: SAP Service Report / EarlyWatch Check usefulness?

From: <Jared.Still_at_radisys.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 10:54:44 -0800
Message-ID: <OF650A1128.E16FF5F5-ON88256E36.0067CDD6-88256E36.0067D1B1@radisys.com>


If "sensitive" means 'sensetive to criticism', I don't really care. As long as proprietary information is not divulged, there isn't too much they could say about it.

Jared

Kip.Bryant_at_Vishay.com
Sent by: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
 02/10/2004 09:15 AM
 Please respond to oracle-l  

        To:     oracle-l_at_freelists.org
        cc: 
        Subject:        Re: SAP Service Report / EarlyWatch Check usefulness?


Well...that depends. They are NOT a substitute for the tuning knowledge of an
experienced DBA but they can be a fair starting point when one is either not
familiar with the application (SAP) or is relatively inexperienced with Oracle.
Plus even SAP says you should test these recommendations and not just fling
them at your production system. Personally, I'm at the point where I'd rather
not have them taking up my time but it should be said that they do look at

more than Oracle tuning issues and may be invaluable as part of the more major
SAP application upgrades (2.2 to 3.0 was major and so was 3.1 to 4.6).

I know that Jared has said this should go to sapfaq listserv but this may be a
safer forum for a critical discussion. I've had SAP call me after asking "sensitive" questions.

Kip Bryant
SAP'd in '93 with version 2.0D

|They are trash in what regards Oracle tuning.
|Total and unadulterated.

|Cheers
|Nuno Souto
|in sunny Sydney, Australia
|dbvision_at_optusnet.com.au
|----- Original Message -----
|From: "Thomas Jeff" <jeff.thomas_at_thomson.net>
|To: <oracle-l_at_freelists.org>
|Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 2:14 AM
|Subject: SAP Service Report / EarlyWatch Check usefulness?

|>
|> Anyone familiar with these reports? If so, what is your experience as
to
|> it's
|> relevance?
|>

|----------------------------------------------------------------
|Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
|----------------------------------------------------------------
|To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org
|put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
|--
|Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
|FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
|-----------------------------------------------------------------



Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com

To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------




----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to:  oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Tue Feb 10 2004 - 12:54:44 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US